Skip to content

undermine the RIAA

Seen on FreeCycle/Seattle:

Hello, my friend has recently come into approximately 30,000 records(!) many of which are old enough as to be public domain, i.e. their copyrights are expired. He has offered to let me digitize them so that they may be distributed, to undermine the record companies and their patterns of re-releasing albums periodically in a “remastered” cd so that the copyrights never expire. I have the computer and software necessary to digitize these records (which include crazy rare ethnic and folk music, as well as odd “mood” atmospheric music), but need a record player with component outputs, ie a linelevel output, so that i can hook it up to my soundcard. I can afford a needle, I just need a decent record player. Help the world, give me the old record player in your garage. Recordings will be distributed on an ftp site and on peer to peer programs (people actually do use these for legitimate purposes!).

Reply directly (I’m not the guy doing this.)

21 Comments

  1. florian wrote:

    I don’t have a record player but I thought the ads on your site were quite interesting so clicked on them ;)

    [ed: thanks!]

    Friday, November 19, 2004 at 4:42 AM | Permalink
  2. adm wrote:

    Aside from the suspicious hotmail username, one might question when the public will see the output of this project. i’m not great at math, but assuming each record is 45 minutes long, doesn’t this guy have about 2.5 years of continual recording ahead of him? Furthermore, never mind the donation of a record player…if he encodes it at 128 kbps, isn’t he going to need about 1.3 terabytes of storage space?

    plug in your own numbers: http://waxy.org/projects/mp3calc/

    Friday, November 19, 2004 at 7:11 AM | Permalink
  3. paul wrote:

    Well, as far as email addresses go, either they’re all suspicious or none of them are: I wouldn’t have chosen that one, no matter what my interests. And not to quibble, but with your email address, I can’t reply directly: I think you raise a good point.

    My guess is he’s never done this before: ripping from vinyl takes a lo more time that ripping from CD (it’s like painting your house: surface prep is a big part of the job).

    What makes more sense would be to distribute this out to as many people as want to volunteer to rip a few sides and share them out.

    I’ll suggest that.

    Friday, November 19, 2004 at 7:20 AM | Permalink
  4. While I don’t have a spare one for you, you can go to fry’s radioshack and get a phono preamp for around 15 bucks that’ll let you plug the phono level outs of a turntable into the line in of your computer (Via an RCA->Mini Y adapter). Turntables with line level outputs are much harder to come by, especially in the thrift store sense. Speaking of thrift stores, you can get a turntable for 20 bucks there, too. :)

    Friday, November 19, 2004 at 7:29 AM | Permalink
  5. Bob Hawkey wrote:

    Truly, the email address shows very bad judgement. The comment about farming out the records is a good one. It might be expensive however. I would suggest sending out packs of 100 to volunteers and getting back CDs or DVDs with the files on them. The return of the records might be accompanied by a re-imbursment for the initial shipping if the volunteer so desires.
    The comment that ‘many’ of the records ‘may’ be in the public domain is a bit scary. Does that mean every track would have to be researched to determine their legality?
    Sounds like a worthy project. Nothing is simple though.

    Friday, November 19, 2004 at 7:56 AM | Permalink
  6. James Steiner wrote:

    This guy needs to do some research on digitizing! If we’re talking making decent vinyl rips, then the last thing he want’s to use is his *internal* computer sound card, unless we *like* hearing computer tweedle noises in the backgroud. A bit more sophistication than is required to rip CDs is needed to make this less than a joke project.

    I wonder: with a good needle and electronics and an excessive sampling rate, could one rip 33 1/4 RPMs at 45 or 78, then change the playback rate to get it back to normal? 2x vinyl ripping!

    Friday, November 19, 2004 at 8:03 AM | Permalink
  7. Writerpatrick wrote:

    If the copyrights are expired I would assume these to be 78s. This would assume that the person needs a turntable capable of handling 78s. 2nd hand stores would be best for these.

    I’ve done some record to Cd and mp3 transfers and it takes a long time and a lot of work. While one side of a 78 may only take 5 minutes to transfer (approximately 10 records per hour, both sides), it takes time to edit them. My best reccomendation is to pick out about 100 and start with those. You may find it easier to record a group of songs and then edit out each using a wave editor.

    Needless to say that this is exhausting and after the first 100 you may change your mind about doing all 30 000. It would take about 3 000 hours (or 1000 days at 3 hours per day) of work just to transfer them!

    Friday, November 19, 2004 at 8:15 AM | Permalink
  8. Adam wrote:

    for about 30 bucks you should be able to get a iMic which sheilds the audio from computer noises and works as a preamp of sorts. I plug a record player straight into the imic, and use the included finalVinyl software to record it.

    Friday, November 19, 2004 at 9:02 AM | Permalink
  9. Monkey wrote:

    You should look into a good turntable and pre amp if you are serious or a turntable with line out like the Stanton str8 series or maybe a Denon check out Prosound for deals .Also I make MP3s with a tidy little program called AR Wizard found at nowsmart.com unless you use a good turntable with a wide frequency range needle I wouldnt even bother.

    Friday, November 19, 2004 at 9:14 AM | Permalink
  10. James Linden wrote:

    I’d suggest that the gentleman talk to Jon Noring (jon@noring.name), who is working with hte Internet Archive (http://www.archive.org/) to digitize 78RPM, LP, etc originals.

    Friday, November 19, 2004 at 9:18 AM | Permalink
  11. Out of 30,000 or so records, they’re probably quite a few that aren’t public domain. Without knowing the era of the collection it’s hard to say, but there may be quite a few valuable, but readily available records. Meaning the original pressing of the recording is quite valuable (like, say, an original Robert Johnson 78 of Terraplane Blues), but the recordings are easily available elsewhere. Sell these collectible records, and you might be able to put together a budget for archiving the obscure ones.

    And if this guy is serious about archiving, he really should get a record cleaning machine, like a VPI or Nitty Gritty. This will make a world of difference is playback quality.

    Friday, November 19, 2004 at 9:40 AM | Permalink
  12. Jaycatt wrote:

    It would also be a good idea to try and locate some kind of software that could take a large full-record recording and split it into tracks. It’s possible to do that manually, but it takes quite a while.

    Friday, November 19, 2004 at 10:05 AM | Permalink
  13. DJ Avid wrote:

    You must be kidding me fool! I spin redkids nonstop, but I’m not even patient enuf to encode a few hundred trax. Forget about gettin with ur hunnies, you’ll be changin redkids all day and night.

    GET SOME THIRD-WORLD LABOR ON THIS BIATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Post your Malaysia contract online and I’ll be a one to donate for the child labor to get this mofo finished. That’s the way to get things done sucka!

    Friday, November 19, 2004 at 10:46 AM | Permalink
  14. Carlos Seligo wrote:

    Heard about this on boing boing. Sop we’ve got an extra record player, which you are welcome to have…but I’ve some experience with digitizing and its the most mind-numbingly boring thing on earth, like seaching for aliens with a radiotelescope. So why don’t you do what the SETIO people do (only more manually), and create a list of people who are willing to digitize a crate of records on their home systems (MOST people have a computer with an audio input, or some USB equivalent, and all you have to do is connect the stereo output to the computer and use a freeware like audacity to digitize the thing.) Sending strangers a crate and trusting them to digitize the records is more likely to get you through this job than trying to do it yourself. EVEN if 3/4 of these volunteers flaked, and you only got 7,500 records digitized, that’s more than you will get done in your lifetime…And by your own admission, the record company isn’t going to just sit by and let you do this in a lifetime. You’ve got to get them digitized NOW.

    Friday, November 19, 2004 at 11:56 AM | Permalink
  15. John Mark Ockerbloom wrote:

    Are you sure the records are actually in the public domain?
    Copyright law for sound recordings is even more messed up than
    copyright law for other stuff.
    (This is partly the federal government didn’t bring them
    into the federal copyright regime until 1972; prior to that,
    they were covered, and often still are covered, under a variety
    of state laws.)

    Some legal experts state that there are virtually no sound
    recordings in the public domain now, except for government
    works (even if the recordings were made
    before 1923, the usual cutoff date for most media) and
    that copyrights for sound recordings won’t expire in the US
    for at least another few decades. See Stephen Fishman’s
    book _The Public Domain_, or

    http://www.pdinfo.com/record.htm

    for one online site’s opinion.

    Friday, November 19, 2004 at 12:50 PM | Permalink
  16. Scott Novich wrote:

    public domain or not, do it anyways! But yeah, you don’t want a stock computer soundcard. You can get a decently cheap one from Friday, November 19, 2004 at 3:32 PM | Permalink

  • bjorn madsen wrote:

    Hello, I am the person trying to obtain a record player for this project. Please forgive my hotmail address, my plan in using this address was that if I picked an address a spammer might use that then the other spammers would not send me spam, assuming I was also a spammer. Of course I am not a paederast, this is merely my public address used when posting something, so my other email address is not picked up by spam harvesters.
    now, on to other points. The records are in decent shape, however I have done this before and have had no experience of my stock soundcard buggering anything up. I have recorded samples from tapes that turned out fine. I am not actually worried that the RIAA is going to come down on me because I am going to select recordings that number 1 are probably not on cd anyway, number 2 they probably don’t even HAVE anymore, and number 3 they mostly are concerned with bootlegs of their latest pop and rap-rock. While moving these records I saw four or five copies of the Top Gun Soundtrack. This is an example of something I will not be ripping. I think I have fairly good taste, and will be hand-selecting music which sounds appealing and/or rare. Also, because of GW and his crap economy, I cannot get a job with my molecular biology degree past the pizza prep cook job i currently hold, therefore i have plenty of time for mind-numbing activities, i just don’t have money. that is why i cannot buy a record player in the first place. they are not as easy to find as they were ten years ago. my receiver was recently stolen, but i am confident i can procure one from somewhere since they are more common. i do however have access to plenty of hard drives surplused from various institutions, because i have lots of friends in networking and tech support departments. storage is not a problem. i am inspired by the dovesong.com website, though they no longer share their mp3’s online. I will be encoding these in the ogg vorbis format, in probably quality 5 or so.

    Friday, November 19, 2004 at 4:57 PM | Permalink
  • Insekt wrote:

    Get the Phono Pre-Amp from a local retailer… they usually hide them on a wall. Don’t pay more than about 20 bucks for it… Get a Turntable from a Thrift Store. (They are more difficult to find these days… but they are out there still.)Then you’re set.

    78 RPM records complicate things intensely… (these are likely to be the only ones not currently copyrighted.) You’ll need to find a 1970′ish vintage player since 78 RPM players were pretty dang analog… and many Hi-Fi Turntables (post 1970) don’t even support 78 RPMs (most likely to protect the Hi-Fi needle.) I have a couple turntables but none that support 78s. Many 78 RPM players don’t have a line-out at all… and if they do it’s likely to be much higher than the current Line Level standard most computers are looking for. Usually the pre-amps built into the old tube driven phonographs were there to drive speakers not plug into another component stereo amplifier. Look for a Library Style Turnatable with 16, 45, 33, and 78 on the speed selector… these usually had a 1/4 inch headphone jack… and that’s what you need.

    Depending on where you are located shipping the turntable (especially a 78 RPM capable tube-driven monstrosity) will be more expensive than just Lucking out at a Garage Sale.

    Somewhat Off Topic… I remember reading about some tech project for using a standard flatbed scanner to “OCR” records into digital audio files… It wasn’t quite up to par for 33 1/3 RPM Stereo recordings but it actually might be good enough for 78 RPMs… and definitely faster than the traditional play back transfer.

    Here’s a link to the way the people at the Arhoolie Foundation did it…

    http://www.arl.org/preserv/sound_savings_proceedings/diamant.html

    Let me know how your project goes. There is actually a usenet forum for 78 RPM buffs as well. You might throw a line in there.

    Friday, November 19, 2004 at 8:16 PM | Permalink
  • Insekt wrote:

    Here’s another Link to a program that’ll let you use a 45 RPM capable turntable to rip 78 RPM records… this pretty much negates all the problems with finding a Line out capable 78 player… but it’ll take longer to RIP.

    http://www.filesweb.com/rip-vinyl/

    Friday, November 19, 2004 at 8:39 PM | Permalink
  • andrew wrote:

    Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
    the ARC list out of the library congress handles jobs like this all the time.
    Librarians are struggling to get records, books, etc digitized before copyright, time,
    or whatever else gets in the way. As stated before, he needs to get a group of volunteers
    to encode these things.

    Peace,
    A

    Friday, November 19, 2004 at 9:58 PM | Permalink
  • skralljt wrote:

    If anyone was wondering, nobody came through off of this website or any other, but personal relations hooked up the record player, ftp space and all of that.

    Wednesday, March 23, 2005 at 1:10 AM | Permalink
  • One Trackback/Pingback

    1. found_drama » Blog Archive » fighting the good fight. on Tuesday, November 15, 2005 at 8:25 PM

      [...] part 2!) » fighting the good fight. Via Boing Boing, we hear of one man’s quest to get vinyl ripped to MP3 and out onto the P2P nets since most of i [...]

    Post a Comment

    Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
    *
    *