<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: values</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paulbeard.org/wordpress/2008/04/29/values/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paulbeard.org/wordpress/2008/04/29/values/</link>
	<description>"The art of writing is the art of discovering what you believe."-- Gustave Flaubert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:30:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.paulbeard.org/wordpress/2008/04/29/values/comment-page-1/#comment-384838</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulbeard.org/wordpress/index.php/archives/2008/04/29/values/#comment-384838</guid>
		<description>I am endlessly hopeful in the promise of cellulosic ethanol derived from non-food stock.  Switchgrass requires almost no care and yields far greater fuel.  Wood and other pulp wastes will be similarly effective.  I don&#039;t think corn-based ethanol is even &quot;in the black&quot; when it comes to net positive energy output.  It takes more energy to make than it yields when you factor in production and fertilizer energy expenditure.  

I met a guy on an airplane a few months ago who said his son made more in his few years on a farm than he (the Dad) made in 30 years in the military.  How?  Corn subsidies for ethanol.  More power to the boy-child I guess, but there does seem to be an impedance mismatch when we&#039;re diverting food for subsidized ethanol and simultaneously pushing back on higher fuel efficiency standards.  Where is the return on investment in that equation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am endlessly hopeful in the promise of cellulosic ethanol derived from non-food stock.  Switchgrass requires almost no care and yields far greater fuel.  Wood and other pulp wastes will be similarly effective.  I don&#8217;t think corn-based ethanol is even &#8220;in the black&#8221; when it comes to net positive energy output.  It takes more energy to make than it yields when you factor in production and fertilizer energy expenditure.  </p>
<p>I met a guy on an airplane a few months ago who said his son made more in his few years on a farm than he (the Dad) made in 30 years in the military.  How?  Corn subsidies for ethanol.  More power to the boy-child I guess, but there does seem to be an impedance mismatch when we&#8217;re diverting food for subsidized ethanol and simultaneously pushing back on higher fuel efficiency standards.  Where is the return on investment in that equation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
