recommended


“Art & Fear” (David Bayles, Ted Orland)

Just over 100 pages but filled with insights and plain-spoken pragmatism about creativity and work. The adage that the difference between the master and the novice being the difference in the amount they discard translates to work, to making stuff.

They even cite one of my favorite anecdotes about the pottery class where the grades were assigned to one group based on the number of perfect pots and to the other based on the sheer volume or weight of work produced. You know who ended up with the better work product, if they had to show just one piece: the former group often ended up with nothing, while the latter learned about themselves, their craft, and their materials.

the greatest story ever told

I just finished reading Summerland again, this time aloud. A simply amazing book, even if a lot of it was over the heads of my audience.

Baseball, American folklore, good vs evil, love — between fathers and sons, fathers and daughters, friends and even the grudging admiration and affection of friends who can’t admit it — and life, it’s all in there. I fall in love with Jennifer T. Rideout each time, and hope for the redemption of the worst ballplayer in the history of Clam Island, Washington, even as I know he will come through.

got a moment for science?

A Random Number:

I am conducting an experiment to see what numbers I will get if I ask a bunch of people to pick a random number between 1 and 100. It was important to me that the page be very simple so as not to influence the numbers people entered.

My guess is that there will be preference towards certain numbers over others. Whenever I try to think of a random number, I tend to lean towards 7’s. I decided to also add those extra questions so that I’ll be able to see if different patterns arise in, for example, males and females. Or maybe math-savvy people will generate less random numbers than non-math people because they think too hard about it. Or then again, it may spread evenly across the board, providing the most boring results possible.

Once I have a good number of submissions (I would like hundreds of thousands, but I don’t think I’ll get that lucky) I will gather the findings and publish them on this page. So check back here later!

I used my age.

testing the new scanner

I got a Canon PIXMA MP150 a week or so back. The seller somehow left out the power cord (one of those ones that ends in a 2 socket plug like an infinity symbol). So I made the acquaintance of Computer System Recycling on Aurora and fished one out of a bin for $2.50. Not the last time I’ll go there.

To test it, I scanned in this old clipping. It’s fast and seems to do a very nice job.

Scan

one more reason why we don’t eat meat

picking some shit up for lunch:

with Uncle Procrustes

As you may recall, I’ve occasionally ranted about Republican willingness to allow Americans to eat feces tainted meat in order to save their corporate johns a few bucks. The problem, besides the yuck factor, is that this tolerance also means we’re eating live listeria bacteria; which can (and occasionally do) kill us. It’s not like banning fecal listeria from food won’t work; the EU allows 0 live listeria per test sample, and it works fine for them. The Republicans simply refuse to do it; so we allow up to 4 live bacteria per sample. It’s a filthy business. But now it’s changed a bit…

The FDA, we hear, has finally decided to deal with Listeria. Will they roll back the meat handling rules to pre-Reagan days? Replace all the fired meat inspectors? Uniformly enforce food safety rules? In fine, re-ban raw feces in cold cuts? Not exactly. Our Republican brethren in the FDA have just authorized the spraying of live viruses onto cured meat products, in order to kill some of the live bacteria that same FDA tolerates on said meat products. Now leaving aside any other consideration, what kind of idiot would trust a political party, which tolerates live fecal bacteria in the U.S. meat supply, with ensuring the purity of this viral treatment?

You might like to keep in mind that only a small percentage of food is ever tested, and that the plants are warned ahead of time.

And what does listeria cause?

fever, chills, and other flu-like symptoms; headache; nausea; vomiting; diarrhea; infections of the blood (septicemia); inflammation of the brain (encephalitis) or membranes of the brain or spinal cord (meningitis); spontaneous abortion or stillbirth

and how bad is it? Well, the column headed “How soon it ends” offers this advice: “get treatment immediately.” Others with the same prescription include e.coli, Clostridium botulinum, and Vibrio vulnificus. These others are somewhat harder to come by (eating raw shellfish is not something one does by accident).

Listeria can come from some of my favorite foods (soft-ripened or blue cheeses) but I’ve either been lucky or the concentrations, if any, have been within my body’s tolerance. But for our alleged government to opt for weaker standards, with a body of evidence about the health risks, is irresponsible. Not that that’s breaking news . . .