defining deviancy down

Hullabaloo:

People and societies don’t just wake up one morning to find they no longer recognize themselves. It’s a process. And we are in the process in this country of “defining deviancy down” in ways I never thought possible. We are legitimizing torture and indefinite detention — saying that we will only do this to the people who really deserve it. One cannot help but wonder what “really deserves it” will mean in the years to come as we fight our endless war against terror.

Sure, right now it’s just a bunch of foreigners and I guess we don’t feel foreigners are entitled to basic human rights. They must not be human — or at least not as human as “we” are. When you think about it, who knows who “we” are either? Right wingers make millions of dollars writing books about how liberals are godless, death-loving, traitors within. Many people who read those books probably believe these liberals are only one step away from being sub-human too —- they are, after all, godless traitors.

Or in the well-known words of Martin Niemöller:

When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.

How did we get to this pass, where we are debating techniques of torture rather than shunning it?

links for 2006-09-22

manufactory

Recent forays into the world of book-binding and camera-building have taken on a life of their own.

One thing that emerges from these projects is the need to make tools and jigs before you can even make the thing you set out to.

For instance, to make a hand-sewn book, you need a book press. A stack of books will work, but a book press will work better and for the cost of a couple of pieces of wood and some fasteners, why not do it right?

Working on making a 6×17 cm roll-film camera and I needed not just the parts — wood, brass tubing, knobs and the like — but some micro-drill bits, a saw, some sandpaper. And the drill bits are so tiny — the smallest is .0130 inches or .3302 millimeters, they will likely require a jig to hold the drill so they don’t break. I may get a small hand drill but I am also considering some kind of bow-drill that of course, I would have to make. I don’t want the drill bit to go too fast and get damaged or wreck the work piece.

Continue reading “manufactory”

what he said

Did I hear a US Senator intimate that if the CSA had been better supplied with military intelligence, the Union would not have prevailed? Does anyone else think a sitting Senator who wishes his country had lost the civil war is unfit for his office? His staff claim what he actually said was:

“If Gen. JEB Stuart had had better intelligence, we’d all be meeting in Richmond right now.”

Oh, well then.

All About the Heritage…:

I sincerely hope that there will come a day when the display of a Confederate flag holds the same political meaning in the United States as the display of a swastika in Germany, and I also hope that, someday, positive invocation of any political or military leader of the Confederacy will be tantamount to political suicide. That time ain’t coming soon, though. As many (but not enough) know, Kentucky was a slave state but never joined the Confederacy. Kentucky supplied large numbers of troops to both sides, but by and large avoided serious battles on its terrain. In spite of the fact that Kentucky remained in the Union, the two statues standing outside the old courthouse in Lexington are Confederate officials, including John C. Breckinridge, Confederate Secretary of War. Some people think that these statues are harmless symbols; I don’t. I think that John C. Breckinridge was a traitor and a defender of slavery, and that there’s about as much justification for erecting a statue of him in Lexington as there is for putting up a statue of Stalin in Tblisi.

links for 2006-09-21

The Conservative Soul

The Conservative Soul:

In the mail: The Conservative Soul: How We Lost It, How to Get It Back by Andrew Sullivan. It’s yet another devastating indictment of the Bush administration by a conservative.

From the book jacket: “The contradictions keep mounting. Today’s conservatives support the idea of limited government, but they have increased government’s size, power, and reach to new heights. They believe in balanced budgets, but they have boosted government spending, debt, and pork to record levels. They believe in individual liberty and the rule of law, but they have condoned torture, ignored laws passed by Congress, and been indicted for bribery. They have substituted religion for politics, and damaged both.”

Does anyone think they really believe in any of those things? They may pay lip service to them but it doesn’t follow from the headlines that there’s anything to it.

And let’s leave out how long it took Sullivan to work this out. Why an openly gay man aligns himself with a political party that considers him an abomination escapes me.

Now playing: Little Red Light by Fountains Of Wayne from the album “Welcome Interstate Managers”

national novel writing month looms

Gearing up for November!:

With a new NaNo season almost upon us, I wanted to spread the word about a few key site events that will be happening in the next two weeks. At 11:59:59 pm on September 20th, Russ will lock and archive the forums, paving the way for the installation of new message boards, and the subequent October 1 site re-launch.

The NaNoWriMo blog will remain open 24 hours a day during this difficult period, and I invite anyone who….

If I do this again, I will try to do my work in WriteRoom. It is a pretty clean way to work without distractions.
Continue reading “national novel writing month looms”

Orwell said it already

Billmon pointed me to this:

Politics and the English Language – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

  1. Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
  2. Never use a long word where a short one will do.
  3. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
  4. Never use the passive where you can use the active.
  5. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
  6. Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.

Not unlike Strunk & White (oops) in its quest for simplicity and directness.

One can cure oneself of the not un- formation by memorizing this sentence:
A not unblack dog was chasing a not unsmall rabbit across a not ungreen field.

George Orwell, “Politics and the English Language,” 1946