how small is too small?

When I hear people talking up the virtues of ADUs and micro flats — more rental opportunities — this is the future I think they want.

Imagine distilling your life to fit in just 7 square metres. There would just about be space for a bed, a toilet and shower, a sink, a microwave and some storage. But no room for a kitchen to cook in, decorations, a place to store equipment for hobbies, or to have anyone round to visit.
[…]
The flat is an example of what experts say is a growing phenomenon of tiny homes, driven by soaring rent and property prices. Microflats are becoming more sought-after and even smaller, they say.
[…]
The owner has already recouped their investment by getting £800 in rent each month. The current tenant lives elsewhere for most of the time and spends just a night or two each week in the flat as it is closer to work.

I agree with this:

Julia Rugg, a research fellow at York University’s Centre for Housing Policy, said the Clapton sale reflected the “inflated nature of the housing market in London” and said it would be a “worrying development” if microflats were seen as a solution to housing affordability.

And while this might work in a city like London with nearby food options, not all cities offer that.

“This is accommodation that is barely suitable as a hotel room, and does not constitute sustainable liveable space. The property lacks comfort or amenity and forces reliance on disposable items. The neighbourhood may well be awash with bars and cafes but relying on these for living space makes life very expensive,” she said.

Zoning and land-use policies often prevent people from relying on the market to provide the things they can’t provide for themselves…

[Update] Seven-square-metre ‘posh cell’ in Lower Clapton fetches £90,000 at auction.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *